![]() |
||||
| Pacific Media Watch | ||||
| AUSTRALIA: High Court ruling jeopardises free expression on internet |
||||
|
Title -- 3875 AUSTRALIA: High Court ruling jeopardises free expression on internet Date -- 12 December 2002 Byline -- None Origin -- Pacific Media Watch Source -- Reporters Sans Frontières, 11/12/2 Copyright -- RSF Status -- Unabridged Post a comment on PMW's Right of Reply: www.TheGuestBook.com/egbook/257949.gbook HIGH COURT'S DECISION JEOPARDISES FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ON INTERNET Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontières) today voiced deep concern about the Australian High Court's ruling yesterday that online publishers can be sued for libel in the countries where they are read and where the plaintiff's reputation is at risk, rather than in the countries where the publication originates. The decision was taken in connection with Australian mining businessman Joseph Gutnick's libel suit over an article published online in August 2000 by the US magazine Barron's, owned by the Dow Jones news group. This ruling could have implications for freedom of expression on the Internet all over the world, Reporters Without Borders said. It sets a dangerous legal precedent that exposes online media to prosecution anywhere in the world where the Internet is present and a lawsuit can be filed for libel. As the legislation governing libel varies from one country to another, there is a crucial difference between the place where a text appears and the place where its website is hosted. "Our organisation believes that lawsuits against online media must be handled by the courts in the country where the website is hosted," Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Robert Ménard said. "This is the only solution to avoid judicial harassment of the press and self-censorship of political, social and economic news published on websites." The Australian High Court's seven judges yesterday unanimously rejected an appeal by Dow Jones for the case to be heard in the United States, where Barron's is based, rather than in Australia, where the plaintiff lives. Without taking a position as to whether or not there was libel, the high court thereby gave Gutnick the go-ahead to pursue his case in the state of Victoria. The Supreme Court in the state of Victoria had already found in Gutnick's favour, ruling that it had jurisdiction over the case because the Barron's article could be downloaded there. It was this decision that led Dow Jones to file its appeal to the high court, with the support of eight major international news media including Yahoo!, CNN, Reuters and The Guardian. |
||||
| +++niuswire
PACIFIC MEDIA WATCH is an independent, non-profit, non-government organisation comprising journalists, lawyers, editors and other media workers, dedicated to examining issues of ethics, accountability, censorship, media freedom and media ownership in the Pacific region. Launched in October 1996, it has links with the Journalism Program at the University of the South Pacific, Bushfire Media based in Sydney, Journalism Studies at the University of PNG (UPNG), the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism (ACIJ), Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand, and Community Communications Online (c2o). © 1996-2002 Copyright - All rights reserved. Items are provided solely for review purposes as a non-profit educational service. Copyright remains the property of the original producers as indicated. Recipients should seek permission from the copyright owner for any publishing. Copyright owners not wishing their materials to be posted by PMW please contact us. The views expressed in material listed by PMW are not necessarily the views of PMW or its members. Recipients should rely on their own inquiries before making decisions based on material listed in PMW. Please copy appeals to PMW and acknowledge source. For further information, inquiries about joining the Pacific Media Watch listserve, articles for publication, and giving feedback contact Pacific Media Watch at:
|
||||